“The belief that there are such things as witches is so essential a part of the faith that obstinately to maintain the opposite opinion manifestly savors of heresy.”
So begins Malleus Maleficarum , a witch hunters manual published in 1486 that launched a new paradigm for all those concerned with the identification and extirpation of witches. Used as a judicial case-book the Malleus set forth definitions of witchcraft, rules of evidence, and the canonical procedures by which suspected witches were tortured and put to death. Written by Inquisitors for Inquisitors, the Malleus construct came to be regarded as irrefutable truth and contributed to the identification and execution of as many as 60,000 “witches”, predominantly women. The 29th and last edition was published in 1669.
Although there was a general belief in witches at the time the Malleus was published they were not regarded as evil or life threatening. Society did not fear them and Church and Political authority certainly did not feel the need to hunt them down. There were many scholars who publicly doubted the existence of witches at the time. That would soon change.
After being snubbed by secular and ecclesiastical authorities in his witch-hunting pursuits, the Dominican friar and German Inquisitor Heinrich Kramer told Pope Innocent VIII of a dangerous outbreak of witches that had occurred in the region. This diabolical conspiracy hell-bent on destroying humanity needed to be identified and destroyed for the public good, but church authorities were not cooperating.
On December 5th, 1484 Pope Innocent VIII issued the papal bull Summis Desiderantes affectibus giving full authority to proceed with “correcting, imprisoning, punishing, and chastising” such persons “according to their deserts,” and threatening to sanction or excommunicate those who hindered the pursuit.
From the late 15th century through the early 17th century a confederacy of “authorities” calling themselves demonologists assisted in identifying witches. Shaping ecclesiastical orthodoxy they set the standards that cooperating political authorities could follow in criminalizing, persecuting and punishing heretics.
Behavioral manifestations included living alone, cultivating strange herb and saying hello to a neighbors cat.Witches were blamed for everything—plague, crop failure, and erectile dysfunction.
Using the nebulous “witch label” anyone with a grudge or suspicion could accuse anyone of witchcraft .
Propaganda, threats, misinformation, guilt assumed from the start.
Physician oversight of witch persecution was standard.
During the European witch-hunts the legal notion of crimen exceptum (an exceptional and most dangerous crime] allowed for the suspension of normal rules of evidence to punish the guilty.
Because of the nature of the enemy the evidentiary bar was lowered and any witness, no matter what his credentials, could testify against the accused.
Belief in the seriousness of the situation rationalized cruelty.
The Devil’s mark (Stigmata diaboli) was taken as the mark of a witch entailing close inspection.
Professional witch-prickers used needles, pins and bodkins to poke the skin with lack of bleeding confirming the accusation. The accused did not bleed due to retractable needles and sleight of hand. False accusations, if exposed, were excused if they were a result of “zeal for the faith.”
The consequences of being branded a heretic by questioning the existence of witches essentially silenced any dissenting voices and the notion of crimen exceptum freed the consciences of those involved.
Sanctimony, feigned piety and hypocritical devoutness was used as justification. After all–Torture and torment are a small price to pay when it comes to protecting the public and saving souls.
Through the witch trials clerics, doctors, and lawyers used their expertise as witnesses to increase their prestige. Witch hunts developed into a means of economic profit. Some gained a lot of money from the witch trials. The witch or her relatives paid for the salaries of those who worked the witch trials including judges, court officials, torturers, physicians, clergymen, scribes, guards, attendants. Even the people who made the stakes and scaffolds for executions gained from the conviction and death of each witch.
“Witch hunting,” wrote the historian Rossell Hope Robbins, “was self-sustaining and became a major trade, employing many people, all battening on the savings of the victims.”
The costs of a witch trial were usually paid for by the estate of the accused or their family.
Far from the conventional image of a penniless hag, a significant proportion of accused witches, especially in Germany, were wealthy and male.
Their property was seized to pay the clergymen, judges, physicians, torturers, guards, scribes, and laborers who raked in increasingly large sums of money as well as other reliable assets.
With a single member accused, a moderately wealthy family could be ruined permanently.
In 1592 Father Cornelius Loos wrote:
Wretched creatures are compelled by the severity of the torture to confess things they have never done and so by cruel butchery innocent lives are taken; and by new alchemy, gold and silver are coined from human blood.
3 thoughts on “How False Constructs Come to be Regarded as Irrefutable Truth: The Malleus Maleficarum Mosaic-Let’s See if She Floats!”
Unfortunately, not much has changed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My ex referred to the concept of the “first false fact”, which means that we as humans may have a default in accepting outside information to first accept it to be true, and I would especially note that it even more likely if the “fact” is either self-serving, or fits well into our already established prejudices.
We accept information as true as our default—the first info about a subject that comes our way, and at face value. That is how gossip becomes so powerful. We do! think about it. We can’t go around questioning everything we receive, or this would be maddening. So what sort of strategy must we adopt to not be so knee-jerk in our reactions to the world of info, and now, with mass communication, this is becoming even more difficult. The lazy person will simply stop there—believing just about anything, and especially if it serves him or her to do so. Maybe the uneducated, though education in and of itself is an inadequate hedge, as we see above and in the subject at hand. A personal philosophy of thoughtful inquiry, open-mindedness? Ok, but not “so open-minded that your brains fall out”, Richard Dawkins said (Yes, right there on Family Feud! —lol)…
On more aspect is that fact is often confused with opinion, to confound this first false fact problem (that we tend to believe the first fact or even opinion disguised as fact that comes our way even if it is indeed false—well, as regards to factual material). The fact, if it is a fact, not opinion, that we can’t even tell fact from opinion is another problem altogether. Did you think that last sentence to be fact, or opinion? Well, it is opinion as it stands, but I’ll bet you thought it to be fact—and it may well be provable as fact, but it hasn’t yet been proven.
Ok, that’s what we are dealing with—false facts promoted by the MBs as truth, and opinions (consensus) promoted as fact, some opinions able to be set to scientific study, others not amenable by their nature.
I am pressing this information forward to give us all some understanding of what we are up against, and maybe then, we can find more ways to be effective upon fighting the tragedies the systems based upon false “facts” and unproven opinions bring with them.
400 physicians die because of the pricks and sleight of hand of the MBs and PHPs. Only by truth and exposing false facts can we hope to help these devastated souls.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Chaos Theory and Pharmacology.