“Physician Health”
TT Wilsons PHP Playbook–Feel Good Fallacies, False Dichotomies and Frontal Lobotomies

Source: TT Wilsons PHP Playbook–Feel Good Fallacies, False Dichotomies and Frontal Lobotomies

Please donate to this effort below. Your contribution can and will make a difference. https://www.gofundme.com/PHPReform
Deciding Whether To Refer a Colleague to a Physician Health Program, Oct 15 – AMA Journal of Ethics -J. Wesley Boyd, M.D., PhD
Deciding Whether To Refer a Colleague to a Physician Health Program
J. Wesley Boyd, MD, PhD
Physicians should exercise caution in referring a possibly impaired colleague to a physician health program (PHP), given that PHPs work closely with their state medical societies or licensing boards but often receive little oversight. The AMA Journal of Ethics is a monthly bioethics journal published by the American Medical Association.
A Rare and Huge Victory Against the Deep State in MA–Bharani Padmanabhan, MD, PhD-Medical Corruption Columnist
British Medical Journal feature “Physician health programs under fire” by Jeanne Lenzer
Last August Physician Health Programs- More Harm Than Good? was published on Medscape and broke new ground as it was the first mainstream medical article critical of state physician health programs (PHPs). Pauline Anderson raised specific and serious questions that deserved specific and serious answers. That did not happen. The American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) and Federation of State Physician Health Programs (FSPHP) both responded to Anderson’s article but completely deflected the substantive issues. The specific and serious questions raised were simply met with silence and patently ignored.
Jeanne Lenzer’s “Physician health programs under fire” published today in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) shines further light on state physician health programs and discusses the lack of transparency, oversight and accountability and profit motive of these programs. Direct and serious questions that deserve direct and serious answers. Let’s hold both the ASAM and FSPHP accountable for directly answering them this time without…
View original post 41 more words
One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results
This group has been protected from criticism for the better part of a generation. They have enjoyed making authoritative pronouncements as unexamined authority. Their power depends entirely on not being questioned as what is behind the curtain is flimsy and dredged, a Potemkin village. The recent Medscape and BMJ articles are revealing that confrontation with direct and precise questions results in nothing but logical fallacy, distortions and lies. They are utterly incapable of responding with a direct and precise answer. Gunderson’s response to absent oversight is just another example of this logical fallacy and distortion. This is not how rational authority responds. This is not how legitimate authority responds. I kindly invite her to debate this. I would like a back-and-forth to clarify. It is a simple question that deserves a simple answer and I know she follows my blog as she used her own name and e-mail address.

Please donate to this effort below. Your contribution can and will make a difference. https://www.gofundme.com/PHPReform
Question Authority: The Need for Anti-Authoritarians in the Medical Profession

“Some people without brains do an awful lot of talking, don’t you think?”
― L. Frank Baum, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz
Any critical analysis would reveal cherry picking and proof by anecdote; deceptive propaganda and double talk; contradictory, illogical and incomprehensible jabber; unprovable and un-disprovable statements and a panoply of logical fallacy. These groups suppress specific questions and deliberately avoid key facts. They misrepresent, censor, nit pick and split hairs to make “data” fit their hypothesis. Little is behind the curtain. The concept of denial is not just used to force people into “assessments” and provide unneeded treatment but used to justify ongoing and unmitigated coercion and abuse. They have been left alone to proliferate like feral cats for the past generation–unopposed, unexamined and unquestioned. Lord of the Flies Medicine. So why are we not questioning this “authority?”
Source: Question Authority: The Need for Anti-Authoritarians in the Medical Profession

Physician Health Programs (PHPs): The Ford Granada of Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) and Stuntman Mike is at the wheel.
PHPs are essentially Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) for doctors, nurses and other health care professionals. The vast majority of people know little or nothing about Physician Health Programs (PHPs) but they should. The grand plan is expansion to other occupations under what they are calling the “New Paradigm.” Deemed “professional health programs”they don’t even have to change the acronym.
Physician Health Programs (PHPs) are being called the “gold-standard” for EAPs. Claims of unparalleled success are being used to promote PHPs to other populations as a “replicable model of recovery.” Drs. Robert Dupont and Gregory Skipper are promoting PHPs as “A New Paradigm for Long-Term Recovery” claiming an 80% success rate in doctors. An article entitled “What Might Have Saved Philip Seymour Hoffman” claims the actor may still be alive today if he had access to one of these programs and comments they “ought to be considered models for…
View original post 1,780 more words
Professional Health Program (PHP) Survey
Professional Health Program (PHP) Survey
Please click on the link below and complete the following survey if you are a doctor, nurse or other health care professional who has been or is being monitored by a PHP (Professional Health Program, Physician Health Program). Confidentiality guaranteed.
Professional Health Program (PHP) Survey
This is a confidential survey. If you have concerns about anonymity please create an alternative alias email address (this video shows you how to create an alias G-mail address), then use the alias email address as your “name” for future correlation.
https://disruptedphysician.com/professional-health-program-php-survey/
Physician Suicide and Organizational Justice: The Role of Hopelessness, Helplessness and Defeat
The current physician health program/ medical board system is beyond fixing. We need a mass movement to demand radical progressive change. Doctors are dropping like flies! In almost all states today any physician referred for an “assessment” by their state PHP will be mandated to do so at a facility just like Ridgeview. There is no choice. There is one difference however. When the Ridgeview suicides occurred the plethora of laboratory developed tests were not yet introduced.
A decade ago Dr. Gregory Skipper introduced the first laboratory developed test for forensic testing and used it on doctors in physician health programs. These non-FDA approved tests of unknown validity presented a new unpredictable variable into the mix with a positive test necessitating another assessment at an out of state treatment facility—a “PHP-approved” assessment facility. The addition of this laboratory Russian Roulette renders the current system much worse than it was at the time of the Ridgeview suicides.
And if a positive test occurs there are no safeguards protecting the donor. LDTs are unregulated by the FDA. There is no oversight and no one to file a complaint with.
State PHPs currently have no oversight or regulation. They police themselves. Medical boards, departments of public health and medical societies provide no oversight. They don’t look and they don’t care. Zero accountability. This needs to change.
Source: Physician Suicide and Organizational Justice: The Role of Hopelessness, Helplessness and Defeat





