Hope to see you there!
“To be sure, and to put this matter to rest for the Court once and for all, the Board has retrieved from off site storage those materials before the Board in December 2011. The documents that Dr. Langan claims were “suppressed” are in fact there—and this should not be surprising given the Board’s many orders since that time, all of which have disclaimed any reliance on the July 2011 PEth test.”
“Documents are typically entered into the electronic repository after being used or after a proceeding not before”
—Assistant Attorney General Bryan Bertram who is defending the Board of Registration in Medicine (“Board”) before Justice Hines in my case before the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Related: MA Board Attorney Deb Stoller’s Fraud Upon the Court
See attached documents for a preview:
- Motion to Take Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts
- Motion to TakeJudicial Notice of Law
- Motion to TakeJudicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts Pertaining to Violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment
Please donate to this effort below. Your contribution can and will make a difference. https://www.gofundme.com/PHPReform
Disrupted Physician 
Hey I am a doctor in Australia! I am ready to blow this corrupt system open right now! I defend myself now, let the games begin!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reblogged this on Jake Steinbrecher's Clonidine Overdose And Death and commented:
Say “Hello” to the corrupt and criminal medical system is the USA.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good luck. I am having eye surgery on Monday and will not be able to attend. If not for the surgery, I would to be there. Jeff
Sent from my iPhone
>
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wish I wasn’t so far away but will watch on video.*** Wonder how this new AAG likes defending the actions of D. Stoller? Any of them who say ” i was just doing my job.” is one sick puppy.
You have a good case , if the judge is not biased and looks at the legal and evidence you should prevail.
They do not like to admit they were wrong or any wrongdoings ! Thanks for doing the fight for all of us !
*** Supreme court, 4th case , check web site oral arguments .
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bertram’s the sole AGO assigned to the case and bamboozled the single justice for almost two years into not looking at the evidence -but this is before the full bench of the MA Supreme Judicial Court ( 7 Justices) – his case has so many holes you could drive a truck through it,
LikeLike
only able to get the states ending argument, my speakers broke and lib opened 0800am my time 11 yours. Bertrams did NOT answer the questions ! skirted around . The woman judge held him to it.
She “got it ” no patient involved. The question was how did the medical bd get involved, he rambled on about positives and chain of custody compromised. When he got done she asked again.
They also wondered about this catch 22 , put you out of work but expect you to pay . I will try to get the video . And his response, “he can always contact the board” . YEA RIGHT !!! everything you say or do is held against you , yes you can contact but when they are hard headed with the taxpayers money whats the point . They have never admitted this made a mistake ! And wont !
LikeLiked by 2 people
What happened at the hearing. Update please.
LikeLiked by 1 person
http://www.suffolk.edu/sjc/archive/2017/SJC_12242.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whats app?
LikeLiked by 1 person
?
LikeLike
huh i dunno @CPSteinbrecher on Twitter I dunno what gofund m,e are for they are sooooo much work 😦
LikeLike
[…] Source: May 2, 2017 oral argument with Assistant AGO Bryan Bertram before the Supreme Judicial Court for the… […]
LikeLiked by 2 people