Defending MA BORM Deb Stoller’s Five-Year Concealment of Fraud–Nothing Left but Logical Fallacy and Lies

imgres-6Bertram also claims PHS has not committed any crimes because they have not been charged with any crimes.  This is called denying the antecedent or inverse error.  It is a logical fallacy where the consequent is an indicative conditional  claimed to be false because the antecedent is false. ( A, then B; not A, therefore not B).    If it is raining, then the grass is wet.It is not raining.Therefore, the grass is not wet.The argument is invalid because there are other reasons for which the grass could be wet such as spaying it with a hose.   There are multiple reasons for which someone who committed a crime has not been charged with a crime.There is always a time-frame between the two and many who commit crimes never get caught.    Luck, stealth, cleverness, and multiple other variables might be involved.  Jimmy Savile molested and raped scores of children for decades and he was never caught.  As a major fundraiser for hospitals this fiend had free rein to prey on sick and helpless  little kids in hospital beds .

Source: Defending MA BORM Deb Stoller’s Five-Year Concealment of Fraud–Nothing Left but Logical Fallacy and Lies

screen-shot-2015-09-26-at-6-13-12-pm

Please donate!  Need Funding and Support!

https://www.gofundme.com/PHPReform

img_0336

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s