Details of how the state physician health program (PHP) scams operates can be seen below as pertains to my case. Occurring in most states under the Federation of State Physician Health Programs (FSPHP), some are worse than others but the Method of Operation (M.O) remains. The template is the same.
As the Medical Review Officer (MRO) for the Massachusetts state Physician Health Program (PHP), Physician Health Services, Inc. (PHS, inc.), Dr. Wayne Gavryck’s responsibility is simple. He is supposed to verify that the chain-of-custody in any and all drug and alcohol testing is intact before reporting a test as positive.
Dr. Gavryck evidently did not do that here. In fact for more than a year he helped cover up an alcohol test that was intentionally fabricated at the behest of PHS Medical Director Dr. Luis Sanchez, M.D. and Director of Operations Linda Bresnahan (who told me when I confronted her with the fact that I have never had or ever even been suspected of having an alcohol problem “you have an Irish last name–good luck finding anyone…
View original post 998 more words
Disrupted Physician 
Because this is part and parcel, whilst it has an ugly harmonious ring to the above. http://ind.pn/1HJnNZi …..
“I have been studying medical research for many years, and the single most outstanding thing I have learned is that many medical “facts” are simply not true. Let’s take as an example the health risks of drinking alcohol. If you are a man, it has virtually become gospel that drinking more than 21 units of alcohol a week is damaging to your health. But where did the evidence to support this well-known “fact” come from?
The answer may surprise you. According to Richard Smith, a former editor of the British Medical Journal, the level for safe drinking was “plucked out of the air”. He was on a Royal College of Physicians team that helped produce the guidelines in 1987. He told The Times newspaper that the committee’s epidemiologist had conceded that there was no data about safe limits available and that “it’s impossible to say what’s safe and what isn’t”. Smith said the drinking limits were “not based on any firm evidence at all”, but were an “intelligent guess”.
In time, the intelligent guess becomes an undisputed fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person