The juxtaposed documents in and of themselves reveal a number of red flags. How does one “revise” a chain-of-custody”? If you do a google search you will not find “chain-of-custody” as an object of the verb revise. It is an oxymoron. A document or opinion can be revised. A chain-of-custody, by its very definition, cannot. This collusion to fabricate a positive test has coined a new oxymoron—“revised chain-of-custody.” Go ahead and look it up. It is a novel one. As it should be.
What these documents show is, in fact, indefensible ethically, procedurally and legally. The first document signed by Dr. Luis Sanchez, past President of the FSPHP and past Medical Director of Physician Health Services, Inc. (PHS) was sent to the Board of Registration in Medicine on December 11, 2012 and is notable for two statements. The letter from Dr. Sanchez asserts that…
View original post 1,170 more words
[…] has now become clear why this occurred at this time. Nevertheless the Board has outlined the decision making process from beginning to […]
LikeLike
[…] has now become clear why this occurred at this time. Nevertheless the Board has outlined the decision making process from beginning to […]
LikeLike
Hi – I hope you will link to my blog.
LikeLike
[…] has now become clear why this occurred at this time. Nevertheless the Board has outlined the decision making process from beginning to […]
LikeLike